As we previously reported today, Star Magazineâ € ™ s history revolves cover this week is all about the dramatic confession of a 21-year-old LA random, that she and Ashton night without a bone, when Demi Moore was out of town. I know some of you think that the rumors dung, or try that Ashton and Demi to play and maybe even to get attention, but I doubt it. Iâ € ™ m getting the same sick-to-my-stomach feeling that I, as I on the first story in the National Enquirer about Tiger Woods and his little friend a day before the letter last yearâ € ™ s Thanksgiving. As in, gut-check reality: This sh-t is probably true on some level. Ashton is probably screwing around. Anyway, to come out since the last report, Star, neither Ashton Demi still has on their Twitter accounts, get mount some douchey, asinine defense. Instead Ashtonâ € ™ s lawyer sent a statement:
[By Us Weekly]
Umâ € | then the statement basically says Star always is full of sh-t, so why not with this story? Whatever it may be safe. But if youâ € ™ re going, your lawyer release a statement why it can not be an announcement of a lawsuit? If all such bullsh-t, why not sue? Instead, Ashton only paid his lawyer $ 500 an hour to a pretty boilerplate denial release - except that itâ € ™ s not really a denial, since there is no reference to such a story above all to be false. Itâ € ™ s only about the history of falsehoods Star Magazine. My gut says thereâ € ™ s check something there. My gut says to verify that this story caused some problems between Demi and Ashton.
No comments:
Post a Comment